Currently reading: Coronavirus focus should also be applied to reduce road deaths - FIA President
Former Ferrari team boss Jean Todt highlights that more people die on roads on average each day than have died of coronavirus
Autocar
News
2 mins read
8 May 2020

International efforts to contain coronavirus fatalities show what is possible with strong Governmental leadership - and what could be achieved if a similar focus was put on to reducing road fatalities, Jean Todt, president of road safety and motorsport body the FIA (Federation Internationale de l’Automobile) has said.

Highlighting that in 2020 there have been an average of 3800 deaths a day on the roads - more than the typical daily average globally for coronavirus - Todt said, speaking to racefans.net: “Our goal to reduce today’s road death rate by half by 2030 is ongoing, but one thing we have learned during this lockdown is that when Governments really look to apply rules then they can enjoy great success.

“Of course, I am not wanting to draw comparisons - road deaths have fallen in line with restrictions during this terrible crisis - but what is clear is that we have seen that, with the right prescriptions, things that didn’t seem possible can be achieved.”

Todt also highlighted the long-term changes to transport and mobility that could spring from coronavirus lockdowns, noting that “nobody could have predicted that the world would be almost free from traffic jams and pollution for a period” but added that it was too early to say what long-term changes could result from it.

“On one hand people have realised how important freedom is, and I hope they remember that,” said Todt. “But I must say I am also sceptical on how long some of the impacts will last. Already it seems clear people won’t like getting on public transportation, so they’ll probably end up taking their own transport, creating jams and increasing pollution again.

“It is understandable, but it is also important to recognise that we must be part of the solution. All of the FIA member clubs can play a role in that and we must look to what can be achieved.”

Dieter Rencken

Read more

Coronavirus and the car world: driving test suspension, more plant closures​

Autocar and Covid-19: a word from the editor​

MOT Checklist: everything you need to know

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

Join the debate

Comments
9

8 May 2020

 I'm sure others have concluded the same answer, of course it won't stay like it is just now under lockdown, but the longer it goes on the less jobs there are going to be which in turn puts pressure on the state to provide help the unemployed, so, getting the Country back working is one shape or form has to happen soon.

8 May 2020
I think it's overly simplistic to suggest that strong government involvement can dramatically reduce road deaths, unless you allow governments to introduce draconian speed restrictions and we go back a hundred years, to the days of someone walking in front of the car waving a red flag (and it takes a whole day to drive a hundred miles)! :(

Reducing speed isn't the answer: Speed doesn't kill, hitting something (or somebody) kills, the speed just increases the rate at which things go wrong and the severity of the outcome.

Given the huge advances in primary & secondary vehicle safety systems, the single biggest cause of accidents is the human sat behind the wheel and their ability to make good decisions.

In over 2 million miles of driving (with one minor accident against me), I've seen traffic levels increase dramatically and driving standards fall in a similar fashion. I find it amazing that most people undergo one test to assess their competence, on one day and are then let out on the road, with no further assessment of their skill or mental/emotional suitability from there on.

I'm no fan of autonomous vehicles, so I would suggest ongoing driver training and assessment to raise standards and keep dangerous drivers off the road.

I would also want much stiffer sentences for inattentive driving (without an accident), dangerous driving (that results in an accident), DUI offences and worst of all death by dangerous driving, so offenders realise the risks they run by making the wrong choices, whatever the speed.

8 May 2020
MarkII wrote:

I think it's overly simplistic to suggest that strong government involvement can dramatically reduce road deaths, unless you allow governments to introduce draconian speed restrictions and we go back a hundred years, to the days of someone walking in front of the car waving a red flag (and it takes a whole day to drive a hundred miles)! :( Reducing speed isn't the answer: Speed doesn't kill, hitting something (or somebody) kills, the speed just increases the rate at which things go wrong and the severity of the outcome. Given the huge advances in primary & secondary vehicle safety systems, the single biggest cause of accidents is the human sat behind the wheel and their ability to make good decisions. In over 2 million miles of driving (with one minor accident against me), I've seen traffic levels increase dramatically and driving standards fall in a similar fashion. I find it amazing that most people undergo one test to assess their competence, on one day and are then let out on the road, with no further assessment of their skill or mental/emotional suitability from there on. I'm no fan of autonomous vehicles, so I would suggest ongoing driver training and assessment to raise standards and keep dangerous drivers off the road. I would also want much stiffer sentences for inattentive driving (without an accident), dangerous driving (that results in an accident), DUI offences and worst of all death by dangerous driving, so offenders realise the risks they run by making the wrong choices, whatever the speed.

Tell me, would you be prepared to take a test ti see if your driving skills are still up to scratch for today's roads?, I agree with two or three of your points, I think the big problem is laziness, people slip into bad driving habits, one hand on the wheel the other on the gearstick or illegally munching or drinking, you can't pass remarks and think would I accept having to be tested a two three years, so you've done a couple of million miles, well done, only accident, but, it could have been your last, luck maybe?, stick em in Prison?, going to have to build more then, costs too much to do that, take there car of them for a period of time?, that's a human rights issue, probably, it would be a start though.

9 May 2020
Peter Cavellini wrote:

MarkII wrote:

I think it's overly simplistic to suggest that strong government involvement can dramatically reduce road deaths, unless you allow governments to introduce draconian speed restrictions and we go back a hundred years, to the days of someone walking in front of the car waving a red flag (and it takes a whole day to drive a hundred miles)! :( Reducing speed isn't the answer: Speed doesn't kill, hitting something (or somebody) kills, the speed just increases the rate at which things go wrong and the severity of the outcome. Given the huge advances in primary & secondary vehicle safety systems, the single biggest cause of accidents is the human sat behind the wheel and their ability to make good decisions. In over 2 million miles of driving (with one minor accident against me), I've seen traffic levels increase dramatically and driving standards fall in a similar fashion. I find it amazing that most people undergo one test to assess their competence, on one day and are then let out on the road, with no further assessment of their skill or mental/emotional suitability from there on. I'm no fan of autonomous vehicles, so I would suggest ongoing driver training and assessment to raise standards and keep dangerous drivers off the road. I would also want much stiffer sentences for inattentive driving (without an accident), dangerous driving (that results in an accident), DUI offences and worst of all death by dangerous driving, so offenders realise the risks they run by making the wrong choices, whatever the speed.

Tell me, would you be prepared to take a test ti see if your driving skills are still up to scratch for today's roads?, I agree with two or three of your points, I think the big problem is laziness, people slip into bad driving habits, one hand on the wheel the other on the gearstick or illegally munching or drinking, you can't pass remarks and think would I accept having to be tested a two three years, so you've done a couple of million miles, well done, only accident, but, it could have been your last, luck maybe?, stick em in Prison?, going to have to build more then, costs too much to do that, take there car of them for a period of time?, that's a human rights issue, probably, it would be a start though.

9 May 2020

Accidents are rarely caused by one factor alone, and Todt assumes all road deaths are driver issues . As well as driver error poor road design, lack of maintenance , car and highway, also cause problems. Should we jail the council leader for not repairing potholes, or the boss of Michelin if one of his tyres blows out.

Look at Risk , very low per mile travelled.

We can eliminate risk completely if we want to. That will severely curtail driving for millions. Ban older people, disabled people, only drive in daylight, no kids or pets in cars, limit speeds everywhere to no more than 30mph, even Motorways. All will reduce fatalities. Maybe we should all go back to horses,  no risk there.

The balance between risk, freedom and cost of travel I believe is just about right in the UK. Technology helps, education and vehicle safety will continue to improve. Nothing radical is needed.

 

 

9 May 2020
*Tried to answer your questions earlier but this stupid format doesn't allow edits.

Yes Peter, I would be happy to be tested (every 5 years would be my suggestion).

I've taken additional driver/rider training several times both on road and on track and firmly believe it makes sense.

I would build more prisons if it were down to me and introduce legislation to seize vehicles from the worst offenders, as we have done with Proceeds of Crime legislation.

The abysmal driving standards of some drivers, I would put down to the blasé attitude they show as soon as they pass their test - that's it, test passed, never gonna be tested again - can do what I want now....and so it all goes down hill from there.

The worst will happily trundle along in the most dangerous situations (congested urban roads), over the speed limit or 2 feet from the car in front, high as a kite on weed, whilst phoning their mate.

As far as they are concerned, the chances of being pulled by the Police are low (not enough patrols) and as they believe driving is now their right, why should they bother?

This is the sort of loutish behaviour that leads to accidents and should be actively eradicated from our roads.

You may not agree but without the visible Police deterrent/enforcement, on-going driver training, re-testing on a regular basis and REAL consequences, are the only real-world solution to making our roads a safer place for all travellers.

9 May 2020

 Haven't seen a Policeman with a speed gun for ages, then again the recent Bank scandal and then Brexit cut lots of budgets up and down the Country, so that's where speed trapping went, ok, it's mostly Cameras now, but a Bobby at the side of the road, his Yellow jacket highly visible was a deterant, and a ticking off at the side of the road had more effect, I think it's Norway whose speed fines are based on your income? With a set minimum.

10 May 2020
I agree with you criticism and points of bad driving, but I don't agree that re tests are the answer, people know how to drive, they choose to be arrogant and obnoxious on the road, they would just behave and pass the test. Your other comment regarding more punishments I sort of agree with, but the big one for me is more police and less cameras. All this punitive punishment for a speed lapse in an average speed zone or likewise for entering a bus lane is nonsense, it's the habitual speeders who always do 40+ in built up areas where there are no cameras average or otherwise, the aggressive tailgaters and of course the loutish behaviour which includes yobs on scooters etc, only an increase in police presence will sort these issues out. And by which I don't mean a camera van.

10 May 2020

Total annual UK deaths from road accident are 1700, if we could get COVID 19 deaths down to that level it would be a sucess!

To get down below 1700 you are in the zone of diminished returns given that the UKs roads are basically the world safest. 

The only significant levers left are autonomous cars (long term), up grading cycling infrastructure and upgrading roads to statistically safer standard.

I suspect Jean Todd is really on about Africa and Asia.....

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week