6
The fastest production Mini yet has 302bhp, a 0-62mph time of just 5.2sec and a 164mph top speed. Alas, impressive figures alone aren't enough

What is it?

On the same day I drove the new Mini JCW GP, I drove a Porsche Cayenne GTS Coupé. The two are not rivals, I know.

But take a look at their respective statistics. The Porsche is a near 2.2-tonne SUV with a 3.5-tonne towing limit and can haul a family. The Mini is a strictly two-seat, 1255kg street racer with 302bhp. Knowing nothing else but that, which do you think ought to be the better driver’s car? Alas, no. What a pity.

This is the third-generation Mini GP, limited to 3000 examples (575 for the UK). The first Mini GP was a run-out special that became more than the sum of its parts in 2006, what with its diddy red door mirrors, no rear seats and limited-slip differential.

Another came in 2013 – affectionately known as the GP2 – and while it too was quite impressive, it was by then also quite expensive.

Now there's this. It has a four-cylinder turbocharged engine like the regular JCW, but whose power has been lifted to 302bhp from 5000-6250rpm and torque boosted to 332lb ft at 1750-4500rpm – both tidy increases (of 74bhp and 98lb ft) over the standard JCW. There’s a stiffened crank with a new bearing, a bigger turbocharger, new pistons and conrods and, appropriately, more cooling to go with it. It is, then, yet again the fastest production Mini made so far, a fact common to all three during their time. This wouldn’t have particularly mattered to how pleasing the first one was, but it has continued as a GP trope. This one can do 164mph and 0-62mph in 5.2sec.

The rear seats are again absent, it’s exclusively available with an eight-speed automatic gearbox (curiously) and the price is £35,345. Gulp. But the suspension is 10mm lower than the regular JCW’s, plus there are funky body add-ons, including a rear spoiler that could have come from a Gran Turismo concept, and 18in wheels with greater offsets to better fill those new carbonfibre arch extensions. Racy.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

What's it like?

Inside, it’s what is absent from the JCW GP that marks it out as something special. In the space where the rear seats was is a crossmember, although this is a luggage stop rather than a strengthening brace. However, there are beefier suspension towers and a top strut brace under the bonnet.

Elsewhere, this is a typically Mini interior, save for a plaque on the dash showing which number this is; Mini opts to tell you the actual series number, rather than just saying it’s “one of xxx”, as some car makers do. And among the series of toggle switches, protected by nearby hoops because regulations say you might skewer yourself on them otherwise, there’s a big red starter toggle, asking to be pressed. So you do.

There’s quite the brap when the JCW GP starts, followed, more often than not, by a few pops as it settles to its idle. Which is jolly good fun in a car park near a race track on a sunny day when people are experiencing the sheer joy of being allowed out for a drive to get an ice cream; but which might get tiresome for your neighbours at 6.30am come November.

It’s enough to tell you quite a lot about the Mini’s character, anyway: this is an exuberant and unrefined car, which would all be dandy if – like a Porsche 911 GT3 or even the old Renault Clio Trophy, for example – this was accompanied by driver-focused dynamics. But on this showing – or on UK roads – I’m afraid it isn’t.

We could begin with the ride. I don’t mind a stiff-riding car. McLaren and others have shown that you don’t have to have one to create a sporting car, but it’s also fine if you do – like a Ford Fiesta ST. And the Mini’s ride is hard, but there’s a lumpenness and woodenness alongside it, which is odd. It seems to add kilos and heft to what’s actually a quite respectable kerb weight. Rather than feeling poised and agile, the Mini feels clonky.

It tramlines too, badly. Across cats-eyes and cambers, it does it. On no throttle, it does it. Use the throttle and it torque steers. At the wheel, on a difficult road, you’re kept as busy at the wheel as you are in an Alfa Romeo 4C. On some cars, a level of interaction gives you something to do, making you part of the process. In the Mini, it’s just wearyingly tedious.

There’s got to be something beyond the looks, though, right? The engine? Ah, yes, perhaps. The 2.0-litre unit is big on power and torque but, some lag at low revs aside, responsive and smooth – and sometimes it makes gigglesome pops when you lift off. So quite why it has been mated exclusively to an eight-speed auto that fails to push gears through with the ferocity of a dual-clutch unit, and jolts weirdly into second on downshifts, is anyone’s guess. This is a muddled, frustrating car.

Back to top

Should I buy one?

I wanted to love the Mini GP like I did the original. It's the sort of car that's right up my strasse: light, modestly powerful, small and agile. But no. You’d have to be a real Mini enthusiast to choose this JCW GP. Which is fine. You’ll be getting a well-finished, attractive limited-run car, and it does feel, and look, special. There’s something to be said for that alone. And it is fast.

And maybe, just maybe, there is a place where the JCW GP works, and comes alive. The Alfa 4C again: initial test drives at Alfa’s smooth, dusty test track were complimentary, and yet everywhere I’ve tried one in the UK it has been a disaster except on a slightly damp, perfectly smooth race track – where it was terrific. It’s possible the JCW GP works in similar conditions, but it feels like it has never seen a British road before rolling out of the factory.

So if you want a special Mini with a mega rear wing? The GP has it nailed. Want a brilliant hot hatchback? Spend half the money on a Ford Fiesta ST.

Mini JCW GP specification

Where Sussex, UK Price £35,345 On sale Now Engine 4 cyls, 1998cc, turbo, petrol Power 302bhp at 5000-6250rpm Torque 332lb ft at 1750-4500rpm Gearbox 8-spd automatic Kerb weight 1255kg Top speed 164mph 0-62mph 5.2sec Economy 38.7mpg CO2 167g/km Rivals Honda Civic Type RFord Focus STRenault Mégane RS 300 Trophy 

Join the debate

Comments
19

6 July 2020

 No, not a fan, 8 always think when I see one that's it's a Tardis in reverse, bigger on the outside, tiny in the inside, it's almost like a fashion accessory, all bling and no substance, yes this car is quick, but I never associate it with being fast, or one of the top Hatch cars, and it's not cheap for what it is.

6 July 2020
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 No, not a fan, 8 always think when I see one that's it's a Tardis in reverse, bigger on the outside, tiny in the inside, it's almost like a fashion accessory, all bling and no substance, yes this car is quick, but I never associate it with being fast, or one of the top Hatch cars, and it's not cheap for what it is.

That the Mini range is not cheap, not capacious and is fashionable or, at least, has a pretty loyal set of followers has never really been in dispute. You can level that criticism across the entire range - relative to its market competitors.

However, the Mini IS a good product, it's just its range sweet-spot is not here. Our German friends (and now Keepers of the The Mini Flame) have developed the GP in a rather lazy way in my view. No manual, no DCT (although there's now one in the range) and poor (cheap ?) damping all conspire to make this a fast depreciating 'stocking filler' to pad out the range. 

If you want fun, get a manual Cooper, a set of (expensive) KW coilovers (comfort spec) and stick with 15-16" wheels. You'll save a ton of dough and you won't need to visit a Ford or Renault showroon....ever...which if you have recently...is an experience well worth omitting in ones life. 

6 July 2020
MINI is a lifestyle brand, cant BMW leave it at that?

6 July 2020
is oddly faster to 60 , probably has a better ride , 5 seats and no torque steer as 4wd , I think it has exactly the same engine. Price wise its similar. I know where my cash would go .

6 July 2020
Sundym wrote:

is oddly faster to 60 , probably has a better ride , 5 seats and no torque steer as 4wd , I think it has exactly the same engine. Price wise its similar. I know where my cash would go .

The Countryman is faster to 60 because it is AWD. The GP is FWD.

6 July 2020
Overdrive wrote:

Sundym wrote:

is oddly faster to 60 , probably has a better ride , 5 seats and no torque steer as 4wd , I think it has exactly the same engine. Price wise its similar. I know where my cash would go .

The Countryman is faster to 60 because it is AWD. The GP is FWD.

6 July 2020

what about the handling and roadholding?

6 July 2020
Overdrive wrote:

what about the handling and roadholding?

 

It tramlines badly and is too stiff. I think it's fair to say that Matt didn't enjoy it.

 

 

6 July 2020
My point was why not make your halo model 4wd , better standing start time , no torque steer etc . Seems an odd decision. Probably because it would be considerably quicker than BMW 1 series with same drivetrain and we can't have that ...

6 July 2020
Sundym wrote:

My point was why not make your halo model 4wd , better standing start time , no torque steer etc . Seems an odd decision. Probably because it would be considerably quicker than BMW 1 series with same drivetrain and we can't have that ...

4wd is better on paper but FWD/RWD is more exciting and involving.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week